we probably lower the EV of our KJ/KQ type hands by raising(where calling should be higher EV)

+we widen our defending range, by raising hands that we couldnt call profitably +we protect our equity and villain doesnt get to realize 100% of equity with his bluffs So to sum up what we are doing by raising a texture like this with a capped 3bcalling range: I am pretty certain you cannot just compare raw equity range vs range(it is easy to come up with extreme examples where it is clear that this approach cant be right).Īlso on the topic of the raising range: Villains bluffs dont have that much equity on this board vs our calling range(compared to a board like J95ss).

Well the point i am trying to make is what 'hitting the board better' really means. Also, if you raise 50% KJ, KQ, then SB gets even bigger equity advantage on turn, you have less bluff catchers and less fd, bdfd, so hard to continue on turn and river. Also, why do you think that EV of raise for KQ, KJ is > than EV of call flop? What also doesnt make sense to me, is that you assume SB cbets 100% range? I would cbet KQ+ for value, check 2nd pairs and rest of Kx, KK so I think you cant raise KJ, KQ for value, it is just bluff catcher. Regarding ranges, I understand that you want to raise more agro on flop, but somehow it makes more sense to me to defend only by calling because board is dry and SB has nice equity advantage. For me it is very tiring to follow how you constructe ranges in CREV, and iteratively correct your mistakes, then CREV has so many numbers and colors, and you are clicking very fast. Imo you could prepare ranges and just visualize them, then explain everything, it could be done in 5-10 min. Hi, I think the video looks more like CREV tutorial, than what content of video should be.

Cbet AK sb vs BU 3bet poker